How safe are private aircraft?

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: safety

.

In Canada the accident rate for private (including corporate) planes was 28.4 per 100,000 flying hours in 2002. That rate is much higher than the rate for commuter planes and airliners but the rate has been dropping over the years.

According to a 2002 TSB report, “the generally accepted factors that contribute to these higher accident rates include less stringent aircraft certification standards, reduced pilot training requirements, lower pilot experience, higher instances of single-pilot operations, greater proportions of time spent in low-altitude VFR operations, and more frequent use of small airports and landing strips that are not equipped with navigation and landing aids.”

In 2011, there were 224 accidents involving single engine aircraft in Canada, 29 of them fatal.

In the U.S. in 2010, general aviation aircraft were involved in 1,435 accidents, 267 of them fatal. General aviation excludes passenger planes, cargo planes, air taxis, air medical and air tours.

The complete story can be found at CBC News Canada.

For more information about Brodkowitz Law and our work to advocate for people injured in the aviation industry, including plane crash victims, visit our website or contact us.

3 feared dead in plane crash near Kelowna, B.C.

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: safety

.

Posted: May 13, 2012 9:12 PM PT, Last Updated: May 14, 2012 9:38 AM PT

Officials confirm 1 dead and 2 other people not expected to have survived 

It is feared three people were killed in a float plane crash about 25 kilometres southwest of Kelowna in the Okanagan region of B.C. on Sunday evening.

The single-engine de Havilland Beaver float plane went down in a heavily wooded area on an embankment below Highway 97C about seven kilometres west of the intersection of Brenda Mines Road around 6:45 p.m. PT.

 

Intersection of brenda mines road and 97C

On Sunday night emergency officials confirmed that at least one person died in the crash, but were waiting to access the site again on Monday morning before confirming the fate of the two other people.

Crews from B.C. Ambulance and the West Kelowna Fire Department responded to the crash, but officials say they do not believe anyone could have survived the fiery crash and they expect to begin the recovery effort on Monday morning.

The Transportation Safety Board was sending investigators to the scene to examine the crash site to determine a cause.

The plane was reportedly on a day trip from Pitt Meadows, east of Vancouver. It had departed Kelowna on its return trip when witnesses said they saw it flying low over the trees, according to RCMP Const. Claudette St. Thomas.

“They noticed that the airplane turned around and started heading back towards the Merritt area as if it were looking for a landing area, possibly the highway and … the plane went down.”

Weather conditions were good at the time of the crash.

The plane was carrying five people when it left Pitt Meadows, but Capt. Greg Clarke from the Joint Rescue Centre in Victoria said only three were on board for the return flight when it crashed.

For the full story, video and additional pictures, click here.

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada posts aviation reports on their website, click here to monitor the website for report information regarding this incident.

Please also visit our website, brodkowitzlaw.com or contact us for more information about our experience representing victims of aviation incidents.

FAA proposes $210,000 civil penalty against Alaska Airlines

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: safety

.

The FAA is proposing a civil penalty of $210,000 against Seattle-based Alaska Airlines (AS) for allegedly failing to properly document and tag deactivated systems and equipment before making repairs.

In a statement, the FAA alleged that on 10 occasions between June 19, 2010, and Jan.13, 2011, AS performed maintenance on six of its Boeing 737 airplanes but failed to document the alternative actions it took and install the appropriate danger tag. “These requirements are safety measures designed to reduce hazards to technicians during maintenance and to prevent potential damage to the aircraft and onboard systems,” FAA said.

An AS spokesman told ATW, “In these instances, Alaska performed the required maintenance work according to the aircraft manufacturer’s specifications; however, we did not properly document the alternate procedure. The maintenance was performed during ground operational checks and at no time were passengers or employees in danger.”

Since receiving the letter of investigation, AS said it has “implemented a number of changes to ensure compliance, including revising the maintenance manual, implementing a new training program for aircraft technicians and performing routine compliance audits. We are also working cooperatively with the FAA to resolve the proposed penalty,” the spokesman told ATW.

AS has 30 days to respond to the agency.

Full story, here. To view the FAA press release click, here.

Another press release from the FAA indicates a proposed civil penalty against Horizon Air in the amount of $445,125.00 for allegedly operating a Bombardier Dash-8-400 aircraft on 45 flights when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations, see below for a copy of the FAA press release:

FAA News
May 3, 2012

Contact: Allen Kenitzer or Mike Fergus                          

Phone: 425-227-2015

 

FAA Proposes $445,125 Civil Penalty Against Horizon Air


SEATTLE – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $445,125 civil penalty against Horizon Air of Seattle for allegedly operating a Bombardier Dash-8-400 aircraft on 45 flights when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

 

The FAA alleges Horizon failed to comply with an airworthiness directive (AD) that required the airline to inspect for cracked or corroded engine nacelle fittings on its Dash-8-400 aircraft. The AD, with an effective date of March 17, 2011, ordered inspections of the nacelles every 300 operating hours, and repairs as needed.

 

Between March 17 and 23, 2011, Horizon operated the aircraft on at least 45 revenue passenger flights when it had accumulated more than 300 hours of flight time since its last inspection.

 

Horizon has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

 

To view the press release via the FAA website, click here.

For more information about FAA civil penalties, click here.

For more inforamtion about what Brodkowitz Law is doing to advocate for injured passengers and crew, please visit our webiste or contact us.

Passengers Burned By Hot Coffee or Tea On Flights.

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Burns

 

Recently several passengers have sued after flight attendants spilled coffee on passengers during separate flights. A Canadian man was asleep when coffee was spilled on his arm. When he took his shirt off, his skin came off with it.  A woman suffered burns when a different flight attendant spilled coffee on her during a flight. If you have been similarly burned, seek medical attention and consult an attorney.

Passengers On Upset Flight Sue Airline

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

.

By Russ Niles, Editor-in-Chief, AVweb

A $20 million class action lawsuit has been launched against Air Canada by passengers aboard a Toronto-Zurich flight that was mistakenly thrown into a dive by one of the pilots. As we reportedAt least 16 people, 14 passengers and two flight attendants, were hurt when the first officer, who had just awoken from a sanctioned in-seat nap, spotted an oncoming Air Force C-17 and thought they were on a collision course. Moments before, he’d mistaken the planet Venus for the C-17. The military plane was 1,000 feet below the 767-300 at 12 o’clock. The FO pushed the Boeing into an emergency dive, dropping 400 feet. It then, just as abruptly, climbed 800 feet before settling into level flight with the captain under control. Seven of the injured were taken to hospital when the aircraft arrived in Zurich three hours later. But it wasn’t the incident itself, which happened in January of 2011, that pushed the passengers to legal action. Their statement of claim alleges the airline “actively covered up the true cause of the terrifying episode.”

The suit alleges Air Canada blamed turbulence for the upset, offered modest cash settlements to the injured and asked some passengers to sign indemnity waivers. It wasn’t until Canada’s Transportation Safety Board issued its report on the incident that the passengers learned what really happened, the suit alleges. “I have been lied to for 15 months by this airline,” Jaragina-Sahoo told the Canadian Press. She was pregnant and was thrown against the ceiling of the aircraft. She accepted $3,500 for medical expenses and lost time at work from the airline. “Obviously, I would not have settled for the amount they offered me had I known it was a human error rather than just a course of nature.” Air Canada spokesman Peter Fitzpatrick said the airline considers the suit without merit and will defend itself.

The complete Canada Transportation Safety Board regarding the incident can be found, here.

For more information about Brodkowitz Law and our work representing injured flight crew and passengers worldwide, visit our website or contact us.

F22 Raptor Pilots Should Carry Carbon Monoxide Detectors.

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

 

 

 Having watched last night’s 60 minutes program describing the problems with the air delivery system on the F22 Raptor-   I cannot help but wonder if the F22 environmental control system is contaminated with oil. Apparently, one article advises that testing has revealed oil by products in the blood of at least one F22 pilot. Air contaminated with aviation jet engine oil has been recognized to impair the operational skills and abilities of flight crew which of course results in reduced controllability of the airplane. For instance, check out this airworthiness directive. Normally when a substance burns (for instance when dripping jet engine oil becomes pyrolized in or near the engine) it creates carbon monoxide. Are the F22s equipped with carbon monoxide detectors. They should be.

Plane Crashed on Purpose to Help People Survive

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

.

Story by Jim Avila, ABC News

Discovery TV orchestrated a deliberate test crash of a Boeing 727, giving researchers an inside look at what happens when a plane goes down.

The test was done in a Mexican desert and was recorded by multiple cameras.

But beyond the incredible video, the crash acts as a science experiment to improve survivability on board.

The likelihood of dying in a plane crash is very small — crashes are very rare, and an astounding 76 percent of passengers aboard serious airplane crashes somehow survive.

In a 1989 DC-10 crash in Sioux City, Iowa, the plane tumbled and burned, but half the people on board survived.

And in an Ethiopian airliner that plummeted into the sea off the African coast in 1996, 50 people still lived out of 175 on board.

In other cases — including a fiery Denver takeoff in 2008, an American Airlines crash in Jamaica in 2009 in which a 737 broke  in two, and a 2005 crash landing in Toronto — everyone survived.

Because of the limited data, test crashes like this one are extremely important to the study of improving survivability.

In a similar NASA experiment nearly 30 years ago, there were crash test dummies on board who can be seen on film absorbing the impact.

“What you would do is instrument this airplane and put all sorts of sensors throughout the cabin on the dummies inside, to figure out what goes through a crash in terms of forces on people that are inside the cockpit,” ABC News Aviation Consultant Steve Ganyard said.

Among the things learned from these test crashes are ways to improve your personal safety:

  • Sit within five rows of an exit
  • Choose an aisle seat
  • And don’t sleep during takeoff and landing

An MIT study found that the chance of dying on a scheduled flight in the United States is one  in 14 million. At that rate, you would have to fly every day for 38 thousand years before getting caught in a fatal accident.

So despite — and in fact because of — some of these scary test crashes, even when all seems hopeless, surviving a plane crash is possible, even likely.

PHOTOS: See more pictures of Discovery Channel’s Boeing 727 plane crash.

For more information about how Brodkowitz Law works to represent victims and their families following a plane crash, view our website or contact us for more information.

CDC Investigates Bat on Airplane But Not Toxic Fumes

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

 

In the news today there is a report of a bat (yes the small black kind) that flew onto a Delta flight. The bat swooped around the cabin of the aircraft but did not share its saliva before it escaped through the cabin door. As a result, the Center for Disease control got involved and followed up with and interviewed 45 (out of 50) passengers. Wow. When will we see a similar response to exposure to burning engine jet oil or hydraulic fluid on airplanes?

It is estimated that at least once a day an airplane full of passengers and crew is exposed to contaminated toxic air. See Murawski and Supplee, An Attempt to Characterize the Frequency, Health Impact and Operational Costs of Oil in the Cabin and Flight Deck Supply Air on U.S. Commercial Aircraft, Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 5, No. 5. The effects of exposure to the organophosphates, volatile organic compounds and other toxins release by these burning fluids is serious. It is time that the CDC and the FAA react after suspected fume events by following up with passengers and interviewing them. Now, when people smell a “dirty socks” odor on a plane they have no reason to believe that it may be burning jet engine oil. We the public have a right to know what we are breathing on airplanes.

For more information about the effect and treatment of breathing contaminated bleed air, visit our website. 

G-forces focus of NTSB air race safety suggestions

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

.

Preventing pilots from losing consciousness from sudden high gravitational forces was among a set of recommendations made by the National Transportation Safety Board to try to avoid a repeat of last year’s horrific air race crash in Reno that left 11 people dead and 70 spectators seriously injured.

At a news conference Tuesday, NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman released the agency’s recommendations and preliminary investigative findings of the Sept. 16 crash at the Reno Championship Air Races.

Investigators said pilot Jimmy Leeward, 74, was traveling at 530 mph around an oval, aerial track when his modified P-51 Mustang experienced some type of “upset” — a significant event that caused the plane to pitch skyward while making a turn, then roll and slam into the ground nose first near box seating.

Hersman said instruments from the aircraft showed the plane exceeded 9 Gs, and that appears to have incapacitated the pilot as blood rushed from his brain.

“We know very well that that is the limit for human beings, and it is very difficult for people to maintain awareness at 5 Gs — 9 Gs is significant,” she said.

The NTSB recommended that pilots in the Unlimited Class undergo special training to learn how to mitigate the potential effects of high G exposure. The board also said the air races should evaluate requiring pilots to wear special suits to minimize G-forces.

Experts say F-16 fighter pilots, who wear special flight suits, can typically take 9 Gs, but only for a limited time. And those are modern planes designed with tilted seats intended to help keep blood flow to the brain. Average roller coasters expose riders to about 2 to 3 Gs, but only for brief moments.

Tom Rose, a commercial pilot from Mississippi whose father died in a crash at the Reno races in 2002, said it might be possible to require pilots to wear G-suits to counteract excessive pressure changes. But he said it might not be practical, and it might not have helped Leeward.

“The thing that happened out there with the G-load he incurred, I don’t know if a G-suit would have mattered. With 10 Gs, slam, it hits you like a baseball bat.”

Rose said some older aircraft may not be set up to accommodate G-suits. But he added that they probably could be retrofitted.

“I don’t know what it would cost,” he said. “But in the scheme of things it’s not something they can’t do.”

Mike Houghton, president of the Reno Air Racing Association that sponsors the annual races, said his organization will consider all the NTSB’s recommendations, and said G-force training is already being implemented.

But he doesn’t think flight suits are feasible. The gear costs anywhere from $14,000 to $20,000 and could make maneuverability difficult for pilots in the cramped cockpits, he said.

Leeward’s Galloping Ghost was rounding the eighth pylon when the upset occurred and massive G-forces came into play, said Howard Plagens, NTSB’s lead investigator. From that point, no more than 8 seconds passed before the plane crashed.

A final report on the cause of the crash is still months away, though it’s expected to be released before this year’s air races, scheduled for Sept. 12-16. Plagens said the Galloping Ghost’s final seconds will be thoroughly scrutinized.

“That 8 or 9 seconds is going to get a lot of written words” in the final report, he said.

Still photos also show that a part of the tail known as the elevator trim tab came off after the plane was already out of control. Aviation experts shortly after the crash had theorized the part’s failing may have caused the plane to go down.

Hersman said her agency was not trying to stop the air races. “We are here to make it safer.”

Another safety recommendation would require pilots to provide an engineering evaluation that includes flight demonstrations to show modifications made to planes are structurally sound.

To ramp up the aircraft’s speed, the wingspan on Leeward’s plane had been shortened from about 37 feet to about 29 feet, and flight controls were changed.

A mechanic in 2009 certified that the Galloping Ghost, after undergoing modifications, was “controllable throughout its normal range of speeds and throughout all maneuvers to be executed.”

But the NTSB noted there was no indication the plane was evaluated “while operating within the speed and flight regimes that would be encountered on the race course.”

“Our investigation revealed that this pilot in this airplane had never flown at this speed on this course,” Hersman said. “We are issuing a safety recommendation to ensure that pilots and their modified airplanes are put through their paces prior to race day.”

Houghton, however, said Leeward likely would have opened the throttles during practice rounds.

Other safety recommendations involve changes to the race course layout and where fuel trucks and spectators are located.

Hersman said it’s possible that putting more distance between the planes and the spectators could have helped, but stopped short of saying the tragedy could have been prevented by such a change. “I don’t think we can say what the outcome would have been,” she said.

The association’s event at Reno Stead Airport is the only event of its kind, where planes fly wing-tip-to-wing-tip around an oval, aerial pylon track, sometimes just 50 feet off the ground and at speeds that can top 500 mph.

Houghton said he welcomed the NTSB recommendations and most were “doable.” But he doesn’t think having them in place last fall would have changed the course of events.

“I don’t think any of these would have had an impact on the tragedy we experienced,”

The association must still get a waiver from the FAA and a permit from the Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority, which owns the airport, before the September races can be held.

The full story can be found, here.

For view additional information gathered by Brodkowitz Law about the 2011 Reno Air Race Crash, visit our website or contact us for more information.

Plane makes emergency landing at Newark Liberty International Airport

Author: Alisa Brodkowitz  |  Category: Other Events

.

Photograph courtesy of ABC7, for this and more pictures, click here.

On February 27, 2012, a Shuttle  American aircraft, operated as United Express (d/b/a United Airlines) Flight 5124, crash landed at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) when the nose landing gear failed.  The flight originated in Atlanta, Georgia at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL).  Following the terrifying emergency landing, passengers deplaned onto a foam covered runway via the plane’s emergency chutes.

Prior to landing an indicator light came on in the Embraer 170 aircraft, indicating that the gear was not down.  The pilot did a fly by at the Air Traffic Control Tower and it was confirmed that the gear was in fact, not down.  The pilot immediatly declared an emergency and asked for fire rescue to meet the plane.

The full story can be found, here.

Additional pictures from the scene of the crash, can be found, here.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) does not appear to be investigating.

If you were injured at any time during this event, either during the crash landing, evactuation, etc. you may want to consult with an attorney at your first opportunity to learn of your rights.  If you have been contact by a “representative” from the airline, you may be speaking to an attorney hired by the airline.

If you have any questions regarding this information or would like to learn more about Brodkowitz Law’s work representing injured passengers of commercial airline flights, visit our website or contact us for a free consulation.